Sunday, September 18, 2022

Surigao Electric Company vs Municipal of Surigao [24 SCRA 898 30 August 1968]

 - CASE DIGEST -

Surigao Electric Company vs Municipal of Surigao

24 SCRA 898

30 August 1968



SUBJECT: LAW ON PUBLIC CORPORATION

Topic: LGU as an agent of the State; Governmental Functions of LGU


FACTS: On June 1960, Congress amended the Public Service Act, one of the changes introduced doing away with the requirement of a certificate of public convenience and necessity from the Public Service Commission for public services owned and operated by government entities or government-owned or controlled corporations. The petitioners, Surigao Electric Co. challenged the validity of the said order.

 

ISSUE: Whether or not a municipality of Surigao can directly maintain and operate an electric plant without obtaining a specific franchise for the purpose and without a certificate of public convenience and necessity duly issued by the Public Service Commission.

 

RULING: YES. Municipal government actually functions as extension of national government and, therefore, it is an instrumentality of the latter. By express provision of Public Service Act (Act 2677), an instrumentality of the government is exempted from the jurisdiction of the PSC except with respect to fixing the rate.

 

The court held that a municipality corporation maintains a dual personality: governmental and corporate. Municipal corporations may promote public services without the need of a certificate of public convenience. This exercise of governmental prerogatives comes within the undefined scope of police power of the State. No franchise or right can override the proper exercise of police power of the government. The Amendatory Act provided in the Public Service Act lend encouragement and support for municipality corporations to undertake activities, and to better enable it to aid the State.


Click Here to View Full Text of the Case


No comments:

Post a Comment

Easycall Communications Phils., Inc. vs. Edward King, G.R. No. 145901, December 15, 2005

 CASE DIGEST Easycall Communications Phils., Inc. vs. Edward King G.R. No. 145901, December 15, 2005 THIRD DIVISION, CORONA J.     C...