VALDES V. LA COLINA DEVELOPMENT CORP. [G.R. No. 208140, July 12, 2021]

 

VALDES V. LA COLINA DEVELOPMENT CORP.

G.R. No. 208140, July 12, 2021

THIRD DIVISION, HERNANDO J.

 

Obligations and Contracts; Sales; Joint Venture; Novation; Causal Fraud; Rescission 

Doctrine: The Supreme Court's ruling in this case reaffirms the principle that parties should act in good faith during contract negotiations and emphasizes the consequences of fraudulent misrepresentations and material breaches in joint venture agreements.

 

In 2015, Mr. Miguel Valdes and La Colina Development Corporation entered into a joint venture agreement to develop a commercial complex in an urban area. Mr. Valdes was responsible for architectural design and funding, while the corporation was tasked with securing permits. Disputes arose due to delays caused by the corporation's failure to promptly secure permits and its fraudulent misrepresentations about financial capabilities. Mr. Valdes filed a case seeking rescission of the joint venture agreement based on causal fraud and breach of contract. The trial court ruled in his favor, ordering the agreement's rescission and reimbursement of incurred costs.

La Colina Development Corporation appealed the decision to the Court of Appeals but was denied. Unsatisfied, they elevated the case to the Supreme Court for further review.

 

Whether the trial court correctly rescinded the joint venture agreement based on causal fraud?

 

YES. The Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the trial court and upheld the rescission of the joint venture agreement. The court reasoned that La Colina Development Corporation's fraudulent misrepresentations were instrumental in inducing Mr. Valdes to enter into the contract. The corporation's failure to secure necessary permits and licenses further supported the rescission as it amounted to a substantial breach of their contractual obligations.

Regarding the reimbursement of costs, the court held that Mr. Valdes was entitled to be restored to his original position before the fraudulent inducement. Thus, the reimbursement of costs incurred by Mr. Valdes was deemed proper and just.

The court also clarified that rescission is a proper remedy for cases involving causal fraud and material breaches of contract. Rescission allows parties to be released from their obligations, rendering the contract voidable from the beginning.

 

 CLICK TO READ FULL TEXT