-CASE DIGEST-
Bara Lidasan v. COMELEC
27 SCRA 533
October 25, 1967
SUBJECT: LAW ON PUBLIC CORPORATION
Topic: Limitations on Power of Congress to Create Municipalities; One Subject, One Bill Rule
FACTS: Lidasan, a resident and taxpayer of the
detached portion of Parang, Cotabato, and a qualified voter for the 1967
elections assails the constitutionality of RA 4790 and petitioned that
Comelec's resolutions implementing the same for electoral purposes be
nullified. Under RA 4790, 12 barrios in two municipalities in the province of Cotabato
are transferred to the province of Lanao del Sur. This brought about a change
in the boundaries of the two provinces.
Barrios Togaig and Madalum are within the
municipality of Buldon in the Province of Cotabato, and that Bayanga, Langkong,
Sarakan, Kat-bo, Digakapan, Magabo, Tabangao, Tiongko, Colodan and Kabamakawan
are parts and parcel of another municipality, the municipality of Parang, also
in the Province of Cotabato and not of Lanao del Sur.
Apprised of this development, the Office of the President,
recommended to Comelec that the operation of the statute be suspended until
"clarified by correcting legislation." COMELEC, by resolution
declared that the statute should be implemented unless declared
unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.
ISSUE: Whether or not RA 4790, which is entitled
"An Act Creating the Municipality of Dianaton in the Province of Lanao del
Sur", but which includes barrios located in another province — Cotabato is
unconstitutional for embracing more than one subject in the title.
RULING: YES. Republic Act 4790 is null and void.
The title “An Act Creating the Municipality of Dianaton, in the Province of
Lanao del Sur” projects the impression that solely the province of Lanao del
Sur is affected by the creation of Dianaton. Not the slightest intimation is
there that communities in the adjacent province of Cotabato are incorporated in
this new Lanao del Sur town. The phrase “in the Province of Lanao del Sur”
makes the title misleading and deceptive. For, the known fact is that the
legislation has a two-pronged purpose combined in one statute:
(1) it creates the municipality of Dianaton purportedly from twenty-one
barrios in the towns of Butig and Balabagan, both in the province of Lanao del
Sur; and
(2) it also dismembers two municipalities (12 Barangays) in Cotabato, a
province different from Lanao del Sur.
The title did not inform the members of the
Congress as to the full impact of the law; it did not apprise the people in the
towns of Cotabato that were affected by the law, and the province of Cotabato
itself that part of their territory is being taken away from their towns and
provinces and added to the adjacent Province of Lanao del Sur. These are the
pressures which heavily weigh against the constitutionality of Republic Act
4790.
CLICK HERE TO VIEW FULL TEXT OF THE CASE

No comments:
Post a Comment