Thursday, August 24, 2023

CARDINEZ V. SPOUSES CARDINEZ [G.R. No. 213001, August 4, 2021]

 

CARDINEZ V. SPOUSES CARDINEZ

G.R. No. 213001, August 4, 2021

SECOND DIVISION, HERNANDO J.

 

Property; Donation; Consent

Principle: This case underscores the importance of voluntary and informed consent in donations. The court's decision to revoke the donation in this case serves as a reminder of the significance of genuine consent in the transfer of property rights through donations.

 

After the death of Simeona Cardinez, her sons Prudencio, Florentino, and Valentin inherited and divided the land among themselves. In 1994, Valentin asked Prudencio to donate a ten-square meter portion of his land that was being encroached by Valentin's balcony. Prudencio, trusting his brother, agreed and signed a document without understanding its contents. Prudencio later discovered that the document he signed was a Deed of Donation, allegedly transferring his inherited portion to Valentin's children. The Deed of Donation was not read or understood by Prudencio and his wife Cresencia when they signed it.

 

When Prudencio discovered this, he sought to revoke the donation, alleging lack of consent. The trial court ruled in his favor of Prudencio, revoking the donation due to fraudulent means. Court of Appeals affirmed the decision.

 

Whether the donation made by Spouses Cardinez should be revoked due to lack of consent.

 

 

YES. The Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the trial court and upheld the revocation of the donation. Deed of Donation is void ab initio in the absence of respondents' consent.  

 

The court held that Prudencio’s testimony provided sufficient evidence to prove that the donation was fraudulently executed. The SC held that respondents did not give their consent to the donation of their land to petitioners. Hence, no valid donation had transpired between the parties.

 

It is clear that respondents did not donate their land. They never understood the full import of the document they signed because it was neither shown to them nor read by either Valenin or the notary public. Considering that they did not give their consent at all to the Deed of Donation, it is therefore null and void.

 

 CLICK TO READ FULL TEXT

No comments:

Post a Comment

Easycall Communications Phils., Inc. vs. Edward King, G.R. No. 145901, December 15, 2005

 CASE DIGEST Easycall Communications Phils., Inc. vs. Edward King G.R. No. 145901, December 15, 2005 THIRD DIVISION, CORONA J.     C...